I appreciate what the NDP member has said, but let's be clear. Our original motion, as he's well aware, was to have the meeting within two weeks. To accommodate him, we provided some generosity by going with four weeks to get it in his schedule. It could happen in two weeks. I'm willing to have this meeting tomorrow, but the member has a busy schedule, as we all do. We're trying to accommodate that. It's totally incorrect to say that we weren't trying to accommodate that.
What the member has voted for, what the Liberals have voted for and what the Bloc has voted for is to turn two meetings, or four hours of hearings, into one meeting almost two months from now, and to cram it all together and then move on. You can disagree with that classification, but that's the change to our motion that the NDP, the Bloc and the Liberals are supporting. That's what I oppose.
I'll leave it there, because I still believe this needs to be dealt with now, not some time in the distant future.