Can you explain the inconsistencies of your voting versus that of somebody else? In the boardroom, you're spending enough time together that you're familiar with each other in your own lives. I understand, from previous testimony that I asked for, that there was actually social behaviour going on with the board, so I assume, then, that you all knew each other fairly well.
You said you were following practices that predated your tenure. What information did you have about the previous board, their members and their voting practices? Where did you get that information? Was that shared by other colleagues on the board, or was it something that was brought to your attention?
Clearly, you're here for a reason, and clearly the Ethics Commissioner has a report that had its conclusion, but what's not clear is the overall practice on the board.
Again, I think some people like me, who are not privy to these private, privileged positions, have a hard time understanding that basic rules were not applied, whether it was just you as an individual or whether it was the collective. My concern is how far this reaches back. You have already identified what predated your activity there.