No, and I'm not asking for that.
I haven't seen such a rapid response to something like that in my past. I could be wrong. We could easily go and find out, I guess, if we looked at the detailed information of other cases.
One of the things I'm concerned about is that she declined.... Let's go through the things she did. She declined the conflict advice. She didn't leave the room. There was a whole series of different things.
With all those things in the SDTC boardroom at that point in time, were there any consequences for her or for her colleagues who knowingly saw this behaviour and said nothing? Are there any actual consequences for those board members and/or her for failing to report that or point it out?
There can be wilful consent by people just not saying anything. I've been in lots of rooms where people know other people have said things, done things or acted the wrong way, and people have just let it pass and go by. It could be over an issue of sexism, racism or inappropriate behaviour. It could be, in this case, about voting.
What were the consequences for the board members with the system that was set up in place?