Yes. The act calls for recusing. It does not have a provision for abstaining at all.
However, in a couple of cases, she declared her conflict, and then there was what they call—what do you call it?—the non-controversial motion at the beginning, the content agenda. She voted on those. She had already declared that she couldn't. She should have abstained. She should have actually left the room. The moment she said “conflict of interest”, she should have left the room and not participated. That's what the act demands. She didn't. She abstained.
She first said, “I haven't,” and then she actually voted in some cases. In other cases, she didn't. What she should have done was leave the room.
With the emergency, it was the same thing. She was told on wrongful legal advice, “There is no conflict here,” so she voted.