The way the system works is that, in effect, when there is a violation and we are made aware of it or we investigate on our own, we can expose it and make it public. That is the penalty. It is that your reputation essentially is damaged by the report that shows that you have done that.
In terms of the interaction among the board, etc., all we have is a record of what happened and the testimony of the people we interviewed, so I can't answer your question. I don't know whether there was wilful looking away, as you suggest, or benign ignorance or what.