I'm referring to paragraph 141 on page 30 of your report. There you talk about the distinction between the two terms, as explained in the “Morneau II Report”.
Speaking of very simple language, I think, moving forward, that you might want to, as a suggestion—it's obviously entirely up to you, Commissioner—for future discussions with these appointees, have that simple language explained, in light of the classic examples that she demonstrated in taking legal advice, as opposed to stating to you that she understood not only that her compliance with SDTC policy but also with the Conflict of Interest Act was paramount. She was now relying upon extremely poor legal advice.
I think it would be helpful in the future if that distinction were to be made known to all of those appointees.