I would argue that we've done that from day one. I have a list here—it's a page and a half—of all of the interventions and the work our government has done to get to the bottom of this and expose all the facts in this particular case. It has all the collaboration we've had with independent officers. There's nothing to hide at all.
I can't in good faith support a motion that includes the point that says, “the government's laxity in implementing the SDTC program”. Essentially, I would have to agree with that statement, and I don't agree with it. I don't believe the government has been lax. I believe that as soon as we found out about allegations of mismanagement and misconduct, we acted, and I stand by that. If I believed otherwise, I would say so. I really do believe we acted quickly and were forthcoming in collaborating with all of the independent experts and groups.
If you take that out, I think we could support it.
Again, the fact that it's proposed to the Auditor General is noteworthy and it makes me feel a bit more comfortable.