I'm really sympathetic to this for a different reason from what has been expressed up to this moment. I would rather see the minister answer it first, but I'm hoping....
If it's not brought back, I'll bring it back because I see this also through a different lens. This is outsourcing that shouldn't have happened. We have a public service, and what I would like to dive into a little deeper is why all these contracts were single-sourced and can't go to the public service, and how we've gutted the public service's capabilities. We hire outside the box of the public service so many times, with the least accountability. That, to me, is more germane to this. It sounds like we've captured some of what's taken place here.
The minister can respond when the minister comes here—