Thank you.
Mr. Garon is probably saying that I speak in gibberish. We're all good.
I'll be quick though to finish up. To me, right now it's about timing. I would rather see the minister respond to this. I'd be interested in looking at this with the mover later on to see how we can expand this a little bit more. What I want to chase down is why we're outsourcing so much. Why are there 72 sole-sourced contracts. How does that happen, and how often is that happening?
Also, what has been gutted in our system that we have to be so dependent upon contracts like that? To me it's about that issue as much as it is about the particulars here. For those reasons I'd like to see this put off until we can get the minister to come here and answer some questions.
To be fair to my colleague who moved this, we're telling him he has to use some of his questioning time to ask the minister about that. I also concede that in that way we are actually putting a burden on my colleague with respect to this motion. I think we should recognize that and try to find a solution to that. I think the motion is fair, and it can be done when the minister's here, but at the same time it is going to take a little bit out of his time while he asks about it. However, I still think that's the better of the options that are in front of us right now.