Okay.
I don't have to read it, I guess, but I just wanted to reference that we have to make a choice. I won't read it. It is an extensive motion, so for brevity I will not. The motion I have is about credit cards, the cost to Canadians and the impact that's having. My concern is that we would deal with this motion now, making my motion subservient to that, when we know, at least in my opinion, the damage and the effect that's taking place on Canadians, consumers, the economy, small businesses and so forth right now. Whereas this one.... I'm open to looking at some of these things, but I can't support it right now because it comes at the expense of what I do know is happening right now to Canadians. That's the challenge I have when I'm presented with this at the moment.
I just want to be clear on that. The timing, to me, is really important. We have a limited number of opportunities at the committee. I'll finish with this because I don't want to take too much time, and I won't read the full motion. I respect your advice with regard to staying on topic. However, it is germane in the sense that, once we choose this right here, that means mine is basically shunted off to later on. That's the concern I have with regard to this.
I won't support this until I get my credit card study because that is really happening right now. Even as we have this committee meeting, Canadians are consistently getting ripped off. If you look at the models of Australia and other places, it's unbelievable that we let it go this far.
Thank you, Mr. Chair. I appreciate the motion being put forth. Again, to me, it's about timing.