My first objective was to make you laugh, so it has been achieved. My second objective is to get an answer.
When a person pleads guilty, there's a judgment, in which the facts are set out. I understand that the courts will give us the answers we need.
That said, I agree with one part of the motion, and that is the part about the minister's visit. We can ask him questions about that. Ultimately, the minister is responsible for what happens in his department. He has an obligation to assume his responsibilities and explain his vision to us. I think that's probably a good way to go at the meeting with the minister. He'll probably be happy to answer our questions, explain what's been done and tell us about any corrective measures that have been taken. After the minister's visit, we'll be able to make an appropriate judgment and, if necessary, reconsider things.