It could be a friendly amendment that simply removes “without redactions.” Mr. Masse proposed that we consult each other in camera, which would prevent parliamentarians from raising the subject, from referring to it, and so on. I understand that the Conservatives are seeking transparency. Mr. Perkins expressed that objective and I fully support it.
I therefore think the solution would in fact be to withdraw the words “without redactions,” keeping in mind that the committee has the privilege of requesting unredacted documents, as required, if it determines that the redactions were intended to reduce transparency.