I'm sorry, colleagues, but I still don't understand.
I understand what Mr. Garon is trying to do. I thought we were in agreement with Mr. Drouin's suggestion that there would be redactions according to ATI Act. I wonder how we got here. How did we get to a point where we're now saying...?
My understanding, Mr. Garon, is that you said “without redactions”, but I was expecting you to say “with redactions”, according to what I thought we had agreed upon as a committee.
Maybe I misunderstood.