Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'm going to continue with the Fintechs Canada representative. Quite frankly, I think the fintech market is a fascinating topic.
In your opening remarks, Mr. Vronces, you said that we obviously need a certain level of oversight and regulation. In my experience, when representatives from the banking and financial sector come to meet with us in parliamentary committee, they all start by boasting about the level of regulation in the Canadian market. They tell us how secure the market is and that consumers should feel confident. However, when we then ask them what regulations there should be, they say they don't want them or they want fewer. They want codes of conduct or voluntary agreements.
Let's take the example of lowering interchange fees. There have been no agreements on that. There has never been a single agreement between Mastercard, Visa and the government. The government kindly asked Visa and Mastercard to lower their rates by threatening to perhaps regulate them. These companies have offered the minimum, and the government has bowed to them and never regulated them. That's the Canadian way.
I'll soon get to the more specific question I want to ask you, Mr. Vronces.
When it comes to interchange fees, we are told, for example, that Canada is in the global average. When you look at the situation, you see that all the businesses that charge higher interchange fees than in Canada are in less regulated markets. On the other hand, all the countries where interchange fees have been reduced, such as New Zealand, Great Britain and other European countries, are of the opinion that interchange fees must be regulated. Even the U.S. Federal Reserve agrees. At the end of the day, interchange fees in those countries are lower than they are in Canada.
Mr. Vronces, if we were to further regulate fintech, in other words, impose real regulations with teeth, not a code of conduct, what would be the three most important regulatory elements that the federal government should introduce right now?