Okay.
When we look at the way it's going to quadruple in price over the next number of years—just the carbon tax alone—does that not send the wrong signal to consumers, when we have a price on production, transportation and energy, about what that will do long-term to consumers going forward? To me, it's actually quite obvious. I'm from Saskatchewan. We're an agriculture region, but we're also an energy-producing region, so we have the two main components right there.
I see it first-hand on my own bills. I grew up on a farm. I know what our costs were. I know how detrimental these taxes are and can be. They say there's an exemption on agriculture. There is on some aspects of it, but not on all aspects of it. Even just those parts of it are devastating to producers. When you look at the way that economics works and the trickle-down impact of who ends up paying all the bills, producers like farmers are price-takers, and then consumers are the ones who get stuck paying the bill at the end of the day, because everything gets passed down to the consumer. It's a double whammy.
I guess I would end by saying I simply agree with you—