I know that when I shop, I shop around the perimeter. Just in saying that, I'm understanding of the nutritional density, and preparing your own food is certainly how I choose to eat, but every Canadian has their own choices to make.
I'm sort of interested in the fact that you've made comments fairly regularly about carbon pricing, and I disagree with you strongly, but I want to just tease out some of the things I've heard in connecting these things together and then put a question to you.
In February of this year, the Bank of Canada governor stated at another committee that at $15 per tonne annual increases in carbon pricing raise the average economy-wide price level by 0.1 percentage points. I would argue that this is a relatively small amount. It's not insignificant, but it's pretty small. Would it even show up in the CPI calculations? I'm not sure.
Trevor Tombe, who I think you probably know of, an economist at the University of Calgary, has said that the current cost of carbon pricing would be about 0.15%. That's 15¢ on a hundred-dollar spend at the grocery store. He then traced it through the supply chain and said that it might be as much as about 30¢ on a hundred-dollar spend. That's relatively small. When I hear the Conservatives wailing and screaming about this, it sounds like it's the end of the world, like it's $50 on a hundred-dollar grocery bill, to be honest, the way they make it sound. To me, I'm a fact-based person here. I'm trying to understand what is the real impact.
The other thing I want to say is that the European Central Bank did a study. They said that “higher temperatures alone will” push “up worldwide food prices by between 0.9 and 3.2 per cent every” year. That's way higher, so what I'm trying to say is, isn't the cost of climate change, the impact it has on our food prices, significantly higher—like 20 to 30 times higher by my really gross calculation—than the carbon price?
It's over to you.