Just so I understand and to be clear, colleagues, we passed a motion to invite the CEO of Rogers before November 1. We passed a motion on October 31, if I'm not mistaken. He was confirmed for the 28th.
Mr. Masse is proposing that, without going through the formal process of a motion, we add Bell and Telus to the witnesses we want to hear from, ideally on the same date, because that would be for just one meeting. That would be for the clerk to work through.
That's what Mr. Masse is proposing. If I have unanimous consent, I can expand...but I'm looking around the table and I don't have unanimous consent.
Mr. Masse, can you come back with a motion next meeting?