Obviously, we haven't had a chance, because we've been in this meeting, to review that documentation. I would suggest that, if this is a real priority for us as a committee, we take the time to review that documentation before voting on a motion that is sort of redundant. Maybe there's something that's of substance still left in this motion, after that documentation has been provided.
We should take the time to review it, understand what is actually there and what has been provided, and see what it is that the committee desired but that may not have been met. If that is the case—I don't think it will be, as I think it will be fairly thorough—then we should give the benefit of the doubt to the officials who provided the very information that this committee was unanimous in requesting from them.