I appreciate the attempt that Ms. Rempel Garner has made to contort this into something that we're voting against. This is clearly an amendment designed to gut and take out the industrial and labour market portion with specific references to the rationale and motivation for bringing this motion forward. I don't support that, and I don't think that it adds any value to take out all of the substantive stuff, to be honest with you.
The Conservative members seem to want to take out energy, forestry, mining, agriculture and fisheries, all of which I think are industries that they should care about. That's why we specifically made reference to those. We figured that you would want to understand the impacts of both climate change and industrial carbon pricing, in particular, on the competitiveness of those industries. Purposely designing it that way was to bring you into the conversation and have you, hopefully, support what I think is a strong rationale for a good motion.
Thank you.