Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
I would just say to Mr. Arya that I don't want to waste another meeting having to draft another motion to make another request for him to come to Parliament for an admonishment after the fact.
In other committees, we've already seen people ignore a summons to committee in this Parliament. It's been done, so I think we should show them what transparency looks like, and guess what? We have a motion, and here are the consequences if you don't show up. It's going to be an admonishment; you're going to be dragged to the bar in Parliament, and we're going to deal with this right then and there.
Maybe we could scribble it into some little fine print at the bottom of the motion so nobody will read it, and maybe that would work. We could do the same to them as they're doing to Canadians when it comes to jacking up prices on what is supposed to be their fixed contract. Maybe that would be a good way to go about it. I don't know.
To the points my colleagues have already made, there needs to be something written in here to show that there are consequences. It's good to go straight to the summons, but there needs to be something backing that up right behind it. I think we need to write a very strong, compelling motion that says that this committee and Parliament mean business. We're not something to be ignored or something to be pushed by the wayside. We take seriously what's going on, and there are consequences for the behaviour that we are seeing from the CEO of this company.
I think we should demonstrate to them what our intentions are, put it right here on paper and make it loud and clear, so that there is no misinterpreting and no confusion as to what we mean. We'll show them what it means to communicate clearly, and we can clearly communicate that, if you do not show up, you will be brought before Parliament, and you will be dealt with.