I want to thank the mover for the motion. I think it is something that we should have as part of our deliberations here.
As Parliament, we set the terms and conditions of how the spectrum can be used in the public. We also control parts of the industry with regard to how they enact their own competition or don't have their own competition and how they treat their customers.
I think what's really unnerved me in some respects about the testimony here today is that it hasn't seemed to reach an understanding that it's not okay to treat Canadians differently if they have signed on for the exact same product. They have the same contract and everything, right down to the sentences from the start to the end of that contract. We allow a system in place for some to be disadvantaged. Those who are disadvantaged are probably the same people whom we often have to deal with in terms of society. They are, once again, treated as secondary citizens, even by these corporations.
I think that's why I'd like to see some more action on this in the future, because we do have a role and a responsibility for how this is conducted. I'm hoping the minister is listening and following some of this as well. The CRTC has said a little bit.
To conclude, I think it's important that we set some type of standard here that this is not okay. You literally have, in the Rogers universe, some customers subsidizing other customers because they're paying more for the same thing. It's because they had a friend somewhere or an insider. If they have somebody who can help them and they have endless amounts of time to fight, they can get a reduced cost. We need to protect the most vulnerable.