I'd like a ruling on the admissibility of the amendment on two points.
First of all, we've already dispensed with a proposed amendment to remove “report to the House”, which was rejected by the committee, so I don't think it would be in order on those grounds. Second, it's also a substantive amendment that considerably changes the scope and intent of the motion.
Particularly on the first point, the committee has already rejected the amendment to remove “report to the House”.