My feeling is that this amendment that I am proposing to the original motion maintains a large amount of the sentiment of what Ms. Michelle Rempel Garner had proposed in our last meeting.
I think it does change the substance of it to focus on an actual call to action by the CRTC. I think it doesn't necessarily change the overall.... I believe it's an amendment, just like any other amendment that I've seen in committee, that adds something of value. However, I think that also changes whether it should be reported back to the House.
In the last committee meeting, I had proposed not to report back to the House, and the committee decided on that. We decided on it based on the understanding of how the motion was worded, without a solution that was being recommended or a call to action to the CRTC being added.
My feeling is that now that I am proposing an amendment that is solutions-oriented, it changes whether we need to report back to the House or not, so I think—