I would say yes. I would like to reintroduce the language of the amendment that still keeps the portion that seemed to be supported by all of the opposition parties, which is to report back to the House.
It's the same language. I can read it into the record, but I think it's the latter part that I've added, which is that after “Canadian consumers” there would be a comma, and “call on the CRTC to do a full review of the matter, of price certainty and the issue of surprise fees increasing during fixed-term contracts and urge that it take regulatory action.”