Colleagues, I'm torn, to be frank. I've heard some good arguments by MP Rempel Garner and good arguments by MP Turnbull, but here's where I side.
Given that MP Turnbull's amendment introduces the notion of calling on the CRTC to do a full review, which was not part of the initial motion, I would be willing to accept his amendment as is. However, I'll note that if it's the committee's will with this amendment to still keep the reporting to the House, it can also be introduced as a subamendment to Mr. Turnbull's amendment.