Yes. This is another myth that I want to debunk about security versus confidentiality, where security means law enforcement.
This is a false debate. It's security against security, by which I mean that citizens have a right to privacy that outweighs almost everything else. I said almost.
It's not true that police or law enforcement use so much decryption to catch criminals. They use what you would call metadata, which is who talks to whom, much more than what is said. This is not protected by regular encryption. This intelligence is available even when the communication is encrypted and even it cannot be decrypted by law enforcement.
I am a very strong advocate of privacy as a fundamental right for citizens. Yes, in some cases it could lead to a bad person not being caught, but it's a price to pay for something that is so much more important, which is privacy.