Great. Thank you, Chair.
Thank you to the witnesses for making time.
Dean Iacobucci, it's a pleasure to see you. We actually met before, at the 2016 admitted students weekend at Victoria College. I do apologize, because I did end up going somewhere else.
For my first question, I'd like to very humbly push back against the premise of your statement. You said that the purpose of antitrust law is to protect “competition”, not to protect individual competitors. Couldn't one rhetorically argue that one of the best ways to protect competition is to protect individual competitors, and that one of the best ways to avoid the adverse effects of competition—price-fixing or the limitation or control of production, share markets or sources of supply applying to similar conditions and to equivalent transactions—would be to protect individual competitors?