Yes. This goes again to the question that we're talking about in terms of penalties and the question of it being a penalty versus a deterrent. When a fine is so large as to be well beyond any potential benefit that the company directly receives from the activity, we're starting to get into a different level of penalty. The Constitution gives a greater level of protection and a higher burden of proof that companies will be able to receive.
This goes to the drafting of the amendments. If there had been a line drawn earlier on with an increase in penalties but not to this level, along the lines of what the CBA has talked about—here we're talking about things that are connected to Canadian revenues, not international revenues, which are by nature and by definition not connected to the harm in Canada—there might have been a solution. However, we're looking at some serious risk of unconstitutional changes here that are going to throw the whole enforcement regime in the future into great uncertainty. I don't want the Canadian Competition Act enforcement regime to be thrown into that uncertainty because of poorly drafted legislation.