I can take that one.
We don't have specifics on which international trade agreement we think may have a specific concern, but the issue is one of treating foreign companies the same as you treat your Canadian companies. To the extent that the provision does treat foreign companies differently, which we are presuming have a larger worldwide revenue, then they would be subject to AMPs for potentially even less harmful conduct in Canada at a higher degree.
There are assumptions built into the statement. Of course, there are Canadian companies with significant worldwide revenue that could equally be in the same situation, but I think the point is that if you have a fine that's twigged to worldwide revenues for harm that's conducted in Canada, there is a possibility that foreign companies will be subject to higher penalties and thus treated differently from their Canadian counterparts.