That's not necessarily a consequence of a poor approach. That could well be a consequence, in those particular instances, of not being able to prove the burden beyond a reasonable doubt.
I'm not suggesting that the criminal standard is the right one here. I'm just a bit confused about why we're articulating the need to address this problem of wage-fixing.
I know Mr. Wu has suggested that we should treat no-poach in particular—and I think Mr. Dachis suggested something similar—in an employment labour context, but the example before this committee previously was specifically around wage-fixing, suppressing low-income employees' wages and communication between employers in the same oligopoly sector. I don't really understand how low income and minimum wages are different from bread.