Thanks for the question.
Yes, I would agree that the only consultation so far is Senator Wetston's consultation process. When you look at the submissions that were provided to that consultation, they are predominantly from observers and practitioners of competition law, so the range of views is coming from a fairly narrow set of stakeholders, and the larger, broader competition consultation that's supposed to come is intended to include broader stakeholders. I would hope that the amendments before us would enjoy the benefit of that broader consultation as well.
Just briefly on the no-poach, wage-fixing issue, when you look at the consultation paper by Professor Iacobucci, his concern is that there is no financial consequence to potentially harmful wage-fixing and no-poaching conduct. He thinks that there ought to be some mechanism in the competition law to provide that financial deterrence.
I must admit that deterrence is provided not only through a criminal provision. There are ways to amend section 90.1 to strengthen it to also provide that deterrent effect, and that can be very much part of the consultation process.