Understood. In that light, one of your recommendations is to develop greater case law. Presumably, that's consistent with the BIA amendment, as you mentioned, in terms of that private action that is now going to exist.
When it comes to the oversight of the commissioner, this isn't an independent body. This is a body that exists within ISED and is accountable to us, for example. We've had the commissioner come before us. Parliamentary committees can provide a certain degree of oversight, although we're not always the best at it—speaking personally, at least.
What kind of oversight are you looking at? The comparators that I think you identified are independent bodies. These are independent law agencies that require civilian oversight. Here it is not an independent body in quite the same way. What did you have in mind?