Chair, I want to apologize to you that it was my mistake in missing that part. As to Michael's friendly amendment, I'm happy to add inviting Minister Champagne to the motion, which is fine. At the same time, I agree very much with Nathaniel's input. I can speak for myself. I want this study to be focused on Rogers and the CRTC to make sure...because again, this is not the first time this has happened. There are lots of things that need to be clarified. We've seen the subtle changes in communications on Rogers' part over the last few days.
Again, many questions need to be answered, and I want this study to be focused on what happened on July 8.