I'm in agreement with the notion that there is some inevitability to seeing some of these occur. In fact, we've seen it in Japan and we've seen it in the United States recently. You do see it in a lot of jurisdictions. Obviously, some of the other jurisdictions have started to move towards things like emergency arrangements and roaming and those sorts of things. What you don't necessarily find in many of those jurisdictions is the reliance on such a small number of competitors in the way that we see here, nor the degree of bundling that we see here. The impact that was felt in this kind of outage is something that you wouldn't typically see in many other jurisdictions. You simply don't have consumers, that large a percentage of the population, invested in a single player in terms of their services and having so many of those services wrapped up in it.
What I think you also find in other places is both a government and a regulator where there's a greater willingness to become more actively engaged on some of these issues. I think the takeaway from today is that it's only been a couple of weeks, and there's this distinct sense of, well, we can move on as long as we throw Rogers under the bus and they say they're willing to spend enough money to fix this narrow problem.
It's not about just this narrow problem. There are bigger issues. This really needs to be the wake-up call to begin to address some of those.