You mentioned that it's in Rogers' interest to address this. I would say it's now in their interest to address this because it's a PR nightmare for them.
If they had had an incentive to address this, they would have, because the answers they were describing at our committee separating wire line and wireless partitioning don't seem overly complicated to a layperson like me, and it cost them $250 million—we'll say 10 CEOs' worth—to fix this problem. They make over $1.5 billion in net income every year. If it was in their interest, if there was adequate competition, if it was so easy for a customer like me to go somewhere else, then wouldn't they have put more in to a resilient network?