Yes. The Minister of Agriculture should be specifically named as an implicated minister. He should have been. He wasn't. Let's change it.
I think, colleagues, that 18 months might be too long. Maybe we should think about making it a year, to give the impetus for speedier work.
Those are two examples of what I think we could streamline and tighten. Directly to your question, I've thought about those two issues quite a lot since the bill was tabled, so I would be happy if we bumped up the involvement, the participation and the naming of the Minister of Agriculture, and we reduced the time necessary for the framework from 18 months to one year.