Absolutely. You kind of wonder whose corner they're in.
We've been consulting with PIAC quite a bit. We've been trying to get this data, for example. You'd think macro-level data is not too big of an ask or too much of a threat to security. We weren't even asking at the telco level what the data was in terms of the incidence of SIM swaps. The CRTC rejected that. The CRTC said that the hearing does not need to occur because the public has no real contribution to helping solve this problem.
Therefore, the question is this: Is the regulator trying to defend the telcos from being embarrassed or from further legal action? I know that a lot of the times in the early days, when people were trying to do lawsuits around this, they thought they were one-off incidences. When we heard it was 25,000 cases within that 10-month period, we were shocked. We thought it was in the few thousands or so. If you think about it, the prevalence and magnitude of this crime is massive. We think they're protecting them because this could be a big, big fraud and completely embarrassing.