Yes, we're highly supportive of the idea. It doesn't matter really what form it takes. Again, it's all about being able to be heard. We've learned a lot from the different victim stories, because our group essentially is very grassroots. I identify them by scanning through articles and reaching out to them, or they come to us and they tell us the circumstances of these issues.
A public-based approach can help people understand how the fraud itself happens, or those points of confusion that enable the fraud—for example, when they get a text message and they don't know whether it is a fraud or not.
The second thing is that if you think about portability, it takes two to tango. There are two telcos involved in it, because it's typically going from one carrier to the winning carrier, so there needs to be a kind of consistent practice and standard across the industry itself.
Third, I think there needs to be a much deeper layer at the business process level when we're talking about these vulnerabilities within the organizations. This isn't just in Canada. This is in the United States and in other countries where we've seen SIM swaps occur, because insiders or the ability to socially engineer people within the organization essentially enables an open season on people's information. I agree with you on that suggestion.