Great. Thank you very much.
My questions are also for Mr. Baran-Chong.
During your testimony, you referenced your experience with Rogers. Of course, we had Rogers here for an emergency committee meeting this summer, and the CRTC really seemed to be defending the telecoms instead of being a regulator. Your comment actually was very similar when you said it seemed like they were standing up for the telecoms.
I'm wondering if you can go into that in a little more detail. Really, the CRTC should be holding the telecoms to account and standing up for Canadians. It seems like it's the other way around. Could you explain what your comments were in a little bit more detail?