I won't comment on the deep geologic repository and the discussions happening in Bruce, because I'm not familiar enough with it to comment.
I will say that, in terms of the discussion on spent fuel, nuclear waste or however you do it, it is a fully costed part of any nuclear facility. Dealing with our spent fuel or nuclear waste is already factored into the costs. It is stored safely on site at nuclear power plants in Canada and has been for many decades. If and when there is a deep geologic repository built, that will be a safe storage and retrieval opportunity for spent fuel.
Retrieval is important, because we use very little of the energy in a fuel bundle when it goes through a nuclear reactor. There are new technologies being developed that may be able to reuse that fuel and put it back and generate fuel. It is fully managed and well monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency, and this will continue to occur in the absence of a deep geologic repository.