Okay. I appreciate that.
Mr. Kennedy, the reason I asked those more specific questions is that you said, or I think you said, that it was obvious that there were no national security concerns at play here. It seems obvious, though, that there were strategic considerations at play here. We have a strategic mineral, a critical mineral; we have a company in which a major shareholder, to say the least, is state-controlled; and we don't yet have our critical minerals strategy in place.
The question I have refers to the question I put to the minister about a case-by-case look versus a broader strategic look. Would it have made any sense to pause this transaction until the fuller strategy was in place?