We would set out a test for what products qualify. Under the proposal we were aligned on, that would be pushed to a regulatory approach. If that's not the case, we would recommend that the legislation minimally set out the factors that should be considered in exercising the right to repair, so that it's not a blanket.
To be clear, IPIC approaches this from a technical perspective. We're looking at treaty compliance and the language of the bill. We're not prescribing what products should or should not qualify. We are prescribing what factors should be considered in assessing what products should or should not qualify.