That would be the regulatory approach. There would be a framework set out. Certain classes of products would qualify for the right to repair, weighing different factors set out in the framework.
From our perspective, and considering what witnesses have put before this particular committee, it's pretty clear that a one-size-fits-all approach is challenging, owing to the very different considerations that different product categories have. You've heard about medical devices. You've heard a lot about e-vehicles and vehicles generally. You've heard about farm equipment. You've heard a limited amount about household appliances. All of those categories, not to mention the swath of any other products that would potentially be subject to the right to repair, would be painted with the same brush.
Our concern is that basically that's an inappropriate approach. Leaving aside the fact that it doesn't meet our treaty obligations from a health, safety, environmental and cybersecurity perspective, all of those classes of products raise different issues and different concerns. Treating them all equally is a concern.