That's correct. Article 20.66.4(h) of CUSMA provides that exceptions and limitations must be based on an actual or likely adverse impact on non-infringing uses, having been demonstrated by substantial evidence. As it currently stands, the bill would apply to any product without qualification. Therefore, in our view, a product-specific approach is appropriate under CUSMA.
Then, there's also article 20.66.5 of CUSMA, which provides that any new exceptions or limitations to circumvention laws shouldn't impair the adequacy of legal protections or the effectiveness of legal remedies against circumvention of effective technological measures. Our concern on that front is that the current approach—with respect to permitting devices and technologies, so the exception being focused on, basically, permitting anti-circumvention tools to be sold on to the market, as opposed to enabling a service-provider model—in our view, raises concerns under that provision.