It will depend on how quickly the government moves and what classes of products are identified initially for the purpose of regulation. In our submissions, we were very much aligned with a regulatory framework as being appropriate, but should that not be the direction the government opts for, we are providing alternate amendments to the bill to at least address the high-level concerns.
And the other thing to mention with regard to the framework is that the Copyright Act is not a full solution. We agreed with Wilson Miao, when he made comments related to this, that this is just one piece of the puzzle.
I think one of the other misapprehensions we're hearing here is that this will somehow force a handshake. In fact, it won't. The current approach under the bill, which is a major concern, is that it will enable a market to basically hack and create circumvention tools that will not necessarily be provided by the manufacturers. I think that the goal here is to facilitate a service industry that will enable the right to repair and then to look to other forms of regulation to support that right to repair in a meaningful way.