Thank you, Mr. Chair. It is great to be back at the committee.
I tend to agree with my colleague Mr. Erskine-Smith. When we got wind that this motion was coming to committee, the first question that came to mind was why was it coming to INDU? There are other committees that it could have gone to.
When we look at the text of the motion, which we received during this very meeting and not beforehand, it is clear from the motion that the focus is a 2017 transaction. Perhaps the Minister of Innovation makes sense, but why is this motion being used as a Trojan horse to bring all of these other ministers into INDU, when this could be studied in a different committee?
The ICA is being strengthened as well, so when that comes to committee, we will be able to review this very question of whether it is strong enough. That is my proposition.