I would say that we brought this case. We conducted an exhaustive investigation. We found that the proposed merger between Rogers and Shaw was likely to substantially lessen competition in Alberta and British Columbia.
We subsequently looked at the divestiture of the Freedom assets. We evaluated that under our usual procedures and guidelines with respect to evaluating remedies under the Competition Act. Our findings were that the divestiture of assets of Freedom fell short of addressing the breadth and the scope of the substantial lessening of competition that would result from the merger. That's why we brought the case to the tribunal.
We lost at the tribunal and we lost at the Federal Court of Appeal, so our process now is done with respect to this merger.