Why do you insist on sticking with the original agreement between Shaw and Rogers rather than embracing the idea of transferring spectrum licences from Shaw to Rogers in connection with Videotron's proposed acquisition of Freedom Mobile?
I think your role is as an arbitrator, and it is essential. However, it gives us the impression that you decided to get the puck on the ice and take it to the other end and pass it to the members of the Fox project collective.
Through this use, I think that you went beyond your framework and that you adopted a strategy that consisted in extending the deadlines.
Why did you ignore Videotron's acquisition of Freedom Mobile in the lawsuits you filed?