The fact that Videotron becomes reliant on Rogers for certain types of access puts Videotron in a difficult position.
First of all, we don't know the exact facts of the nature of those access agreements. It's going to have to go to the CRTC to see just how preferential or discriminatory they are.
The fact is that Videotron is relying on Rogers to provide those types of services. That gives Rogers a substantial measure of control. It is essentially inviting Videotron into the club.
Part of the Competition Bureau's stance in this market is that a maverick competitor—a competitor that does not move with the flock—is the best way to achieve competition.
In your initial question you asked how we get back to basics on getting competition and good prices in this market. One answer to that is to remove the dominance of the original providers. These are companies—Rogers, Telus and Bell—that have been in the market for 30 years. They are firmly in control of it. They have maintained a 90% share over even the 10 years of a fourth-carrier policy. I think it's very important that you have a competitor that's not reliant in this way on one of the dominant providers.