Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Let's be clear. I've read the tribunal decision a number of times, and what's key is that it won't lessen competition. If I had a constituent or anybody else or the business community that uses services, and I said that was the threshold we should actually go toward, they'd look at me as though I were insane. They'd look at me and say, “That's all you expect—that it won't lessen competition?” at a point in time where we've used a public asset to create highways and tollways in the sky and have made things uncompetitive in many respects.
My question is for Shaw.
Mr. English, you mentioned it would be a scary proposition. Given the fact that we have so many uncertainties here, what is scary about it? Is it going to be for the family? Is it going to be for the shareholders? Why should the public and the minister rescue Shaw for basically giving up in many respects by not bidding on spectrum in the last auction and then basically throwing in the towel ever since?